For 13.8 Seconds, Question What You’re Paying For

Header

You’d think for a piece of software that prides itself on being the most authentic & accurate simulation consumers can buy, massive discrepancies between real world car performance and the virtual counterpart wouldn’t exist to begin with, and simulation enthusiasts wouldn’t actively work to brigade someone drawing attention to what’s a completely reasonable talking point.

The NASCAR Monster Energy Cup series is set to visit Bristol Motor Speedway this upcoming weekend, one of the oldest circuits on the schedule despite it’s modern coliseum atmosphere, for the second of its two 2017 dates: one in the spring, taking place during the day, with this weekend’s being a night race that’s known for chaos and destruction akin to a local short track event. Despite being just a half mile in length, Bristol’s 25+ degrees in banking generate a very unique vibe; insanely high speeds and close quarter combat is the auto racing equivalent to flying fighter jets within the confines of a high school gymnasium. The Monaco Grand Prix may send Formula One entries blazing past elaborate casinos, and V8 Supercars can get a little hairy in the resort town of Surfer’s Paradise, but there’s nothing in the motorsports kingdom quite like Bristol Motor Speedway – a track that actively encourages mangled heaps of automotive wreckage..

In keeping with the standard formula of how iRacing operates, all major stock car series within the popular online racing simulator will mirror the real world NASCAR Cup series schedule and also visit the concrete jungle throughout the week. The top simulator drivers on the service have spent the past few days preparing for a multitude of high-profile events, whether it be the standard top Class A open run-offs that dictate the drivers eligible to compete for $10,000 USD next year, or the significantly longer NASCAR iRacing Series contests, which are more in line with the simulator’s origins. However, in testing for these events, one YouTube user flying under the name of GeneticJD has made a pretty startling discovery – and it’s one that all iRacers should be taking a close look at, if only to understand where their money is actually going.

In a single car qualifying run under realistic weather and track conditions – which he actually addresses directly to dispel the fanboys’ claims before they can arise – GeneticJD, who isn’t a prominent face in the Peak Anti-Freeze Series, but just another somewhat talented sim racer on the service, has clocked in with a time of 13.8 seconds in his virtual #31 Kraft Velveeta Chevrolet SS. To provide some context as to why this might be an issue, qualifying for the 2016 night race at Bristol saw now-retired ace Car Edwards snatch the pole with an elapsed time of 14.6. Drop down the results list to see how other talented drivers performed, and racers such as the inevitable 2016 champion Jimmie Johnson registered a 14.91, while three time series winner & short track veteran Tony Stewart clocked in with a 15.02.

GeneticJD’s lap by comparison is so absurdly beyond what these cars are capable of in real life, it actually matches the World of Outlaws Sprint Car track record set by Sammy Swindell back in the early 2000’s, when the series used to temporarily convert the half mile oval into a dirt track. Those cars have a power-to-weight ratio more ridiculous than a modern Formula One car, and aided by a giant wing that essentially allows them to turn an entire lap at full power while sideways – yet iRacing says a 3200 pound stock car is just as fast. Drawing natural conclusions from the car’s performance, GeneticJD comments that iRacing absolutely need to slow the cup cars down. How iRacing’s stock cars are going upwards of a full second faster than their real life counterpart in a track this short, is absolutely inexcusable.

iRacing reddit

Of course, the iRacing defense force have already appeared to downvote the post into oblivion on the simulator’s official subreddit, with comments conveniently dancing around how bizarre this performance is is – instead wanting to see pedal inputs, the setup used, or claiming that the video was “less interesting than I expected.” And sure, to them, maybe it really isn’t a big deal that some guy with infinitely more driving talent than they have somehow cracked a barrier that’s virtually impossible.

But to myself, and others as well, it’s pretty hilarious. iRacing isn’t just a boxed game you buy from Wal-Mart for anywhere from $60 to $80, and put up with the bad in exchange for the positive things the software accomplishes. This is a game that demands you fork out several times more than you’d traditionally find yourself paying for virtual race cars, and then thrives on a concept called post-purchase rationalization plus an admittedly exceptional marketing campaign, one which makes deluded motor racing enthusiasts believe they’ve acquired the very best in consumer-grade race car simulators. Usually this would be the part of the article where I would take aim at hardcore sim racers roped in by the cult-like mentality of iRacing’s finest to perpetuate such bullshit, but instead I will take a different approach.

When I browse YouTube videos of either NASCAR: The Game, or the current iteration of NASCAR Heat – two console offerings that admittedly aren’t up to par with what we should expect from video games in 2017 – I always see the same comments from miscellaneous users: “Why are you playing this trash when iRacing exists; it’s the best and most realistic racing simulator money can buy.” Sometimes it’s worded a lot nicer than that, but the overall theme remains the same.

IR

I have to ask, what weight does this argument hold now? It’s been a while since we’ve gotten a genuinely good oval racing game, but acting like iRacing is this be-all, end-all solution for dedicated NASCAR fans, only for the most popular cars on the service to generate performance figures that are significantly less accurate than these supposed “arcade games” everyone has no problems shitting on, is pretty comical.  In no way am I defending the horrid dumpster fire that was NASCAR Heat – not by a long shot – but seeing the average person parrot claims of iRacing’s alleged realism, when this is demonstrably false just by comparing virtual lap times to the real thing, definitely raises the question as to what sort of brainwashing has been taking place.

It also makes me wonder how more people aren’t genuinely questioning where their money is going when renting the content on iRacing, and how there’s not a more widespread level of criticism surrounding the biggest name on the market today. Sure, I got screwed over by DiRT 4’s decline in quality – as did many others – but at the end of the day it was a one-time, $60 purchase, not a long-term investment that continuously asked for my money just to explore a fraction of the content available on top of annual subscription fees. And though Codemasters did parade around a couple of real world drivers to vouch for the authenticity of some of the vehicles available in DiRT 4, their promotional efforts were nowhere near as extensive as those carried out by iRacing, who for years upon years upon years have touted close working relationships with a multitude of real world teams and engineers to ensure the utmost of accuracy out on the virtual race track.

Let me ask a simple question: Where is this accuracy customers have been promised?  Because there seems to be a pretty major disconnect between what the marketing team would have you believe, and what actually occurs within the game world. For a development team to supposedly be in touch with Monster Energy Cup teams on a regular basis and actively employing individuals within the Cup series garage area, how in the fuck do we reach a scenario where Cup cars are blasting around Bristol at World of Outlaws speeds? No, it’s not a case for false advertisement, but I’m genuinely surprised that so many people have no problem parting with their hard-earned cash primarily due to the game’s self-proclaimed status as the most accurate and thoroughly researched simulator on the market, with some members even being blissfully unaware that other racing simulators exist altogether because they’ve bought into the iRacing or bust mentality themselves, yet are suddenly silent or apathetic when this authenticity is objectively proven to be false?

I’m also a bit surprised in regards to how on top of the demonstrable lapses in authenticity, sim racers are unable to read between the lines and notice something is amiss when it comes to how iRacing advertise themselves as the pinnacle of realism, when real teams aren’t actually using it.

Chevy SImulator

I’m not a Dale Earnhardt Jr. fan, I’m actually in the Kevin Harvick camp that believes his lack of on-track success has kind of hurt the sport – usually the most popular athlete is also the most successful, and in this case he’s not – but one thing Dale has done a good job at is being an ambassador for sim racing on a global platform, and he’s been doing this basically since the start of his career, which we all very much appreciate. However, in his weekly podcast, #186 at the 42 minute mark if you’re looking for something to get you through your workout routine, Dale mentions that the Chevrolet simulator uses “old gaming technology”, and though iRacing as a company don’t currently provide simulators for any of the teams (which in itself should be a red flag), it’s something they have an interest in – and he’d prefer for them to enter the realm of professional simulators as well.

Yet this “old” gaming technology, which Dale refuses to name – though we all know from pictures it’s clearly a variant of rFactor – helped his own Hendrick teammate tie his father’s NASCAR record by notching his seventh championship last season. In the meantime, average Joe’s on the iRacing service are blowing the doors off real world qualification charts, running times that would put them in an entirely different vehicle class. With this tidbit alone, you’d think people would figure out that maybe they’re not getting the experience that they’re paying for.

Another tidbit worth noting, would be Dale’s own career statistics. Earnhardt Jr. advocates for iRacing to enter the professional simulator realm, as he was a very active driver during the service’s early years, believes the software has the potential to go above and beyond what rFactor Pro provides, and obviously has a great relationship with the people in Massachussetts, but these years spent diving deep into sim racing – moreso than his Windows XP years – also happen to ironically coincide with a disastrous four-year slump that has defined the final half of his career.  From June of 2008 to July of 2012, NASCAR’s most popular driver failed to win a single race – a slump so crippling, his own teammate posting similar statistics lost his job. As you can see from the video above, Earnhardt Jr. was most active on iRacing starting from it’s beta period, until about late 2011 or early 2012, during the initial stages of the new tire model when a lot of people thought it was quite good.

Look, if there’s this top level NASCAR driver going around telling people about how helpful this one piece of software is compared to all the others, but while doing so he’s actually putting up results that would be job-threatening to anyone not named Earnhardt, how is anyone not asking questions about the accuracy of the software, but instead just sort of going along with it and using it as a reason to spend even more money on the game? The North Carolina rumor mill has obviously lit a fire under claims that Dale was asked to stop iRacing until his on-track results improved, because supposedly people figured out it was messing with his driving style, but that’s not really something we can confirm as 100% fact.

110706035416-dale-earnhardt-jr-iracing-charlotte

For 13.8 seconds, you should question what you’re paying for. A team supposedly this in-tune with the current motorsports climate, hiring engineers directly from the industry, and working closely with individuals to ensure their software is the absolute pinnacle of sim racing, should not be producing virtual vehicles this far off the mark from their real world counterparts. Yes, maybe DriveClub’s version of a Ferrari Enzo will drive as more of a ballpark guess than anything else, and sure DiRT 4’s R5 rally cars are pretty fucked up, but that’s almost to be expected with those pieces of software. But with such a heavy marketing campaign surrounding it, one which swears up and down that iRacing is the last simulator you’ll ever need, these claims shouldn’t be getting blown the fuck out by a random YouTube personality who somehow figured out how to break the sim in such a way, Cup cars are as fast as World of Outlaws 410 deathtraps. No, just stop, that’s fucked up. You’ve failed at your goal. Go back to the drawing board.

You should also question why real drivers, the same that can be seen on iRacing’s testimonial pages bragging about how great the software is, are accidentally admitting in their podcasts that iRacing to their knowledge isn’t actually used by any professional race teams whatsoever, yet they’re still advocating for the use of iRacing despite this “old” software winning their teammate his record-tying seventh championship.

I don’t think there is a simulator out there that uses iRacing software. – Dale Earnhardt Jr., Dale Jr. Download Podcast #186

Lastly, you should question why this professional driver coincidentally suffered from a career-defining slump during the exact time frame he was actively helping out with the development of the game.

But, of course, the country club members won’t want to ask these questions, because bringing iRacing into disrepute is against the sporting code, and can therefore warrant a suspension or outright ban for those who dare to rock the boat.

12006606_10204965851654664_3285769119234129181_o

Advertisements

704 Games Achieve Small Victory with NASCAR Heat 2’s Driver Roster

20121597_759309414242699_4078613714142591653_o

Though the moving gameplay footage released over the past few weeks has objectively left a lot to be desired, showcasing little in the way of physics improvements while boasting new tracks, series, and graphics above all else, 704 Games have managed to notch themselves a small victory with their upcoming oval racer NASCAR Heat 2.

Yes, as we leaked not too long ago, the Camping World Truck Series and the Xfinity Grand National Series will both be featured in the sequel to last year’s horrendously disappointing rush job, but it’s in precisely how these two feeder series will appear that has actually set a new milestone for NASCAR games as a whole, and should give even the harshest critics – that includes myself – a slight amount of hope for the sequel, if not the mindset that 704 & Monster are at least acting in good faith with the franchise. Unlike past NASCAR titles, regardless of whether they were developed by Monster Games, EA Sports, Image Space Incorporated, Eutechnyx, or the almighty Papyrus, NASCAR Heat 2 will include a complete field of real life drivers across all major series featured within the game. Officially licensed NASCAR titles have been appearing on store shelves dating back to the era of the original Nintendo Entertainment System, but surprisingly this will mark the first time in the 20+ year history of NASCAR games to boast a 100% authentic starting grid, right out of the box.

Because NASCAR is not under an all-encompassing concorde agreement like our European readers are familiar with in Formula One, allowing developers to obtain a blanket license that automatically ensures rights to all eleven teams, video game developers looking to re-create America’s most popular auto racing series in a virtual environment must individually track down every individual driver, sponsor, and team owner participating in NASCAR-sanctioned events to secure their appearance within their piece of software.

nascar-racing-4-image940540

This has traditionally resulted in very awkward situations in years past, as NASCAR’s notorious silly season, coupled with sponsorship feuds and tight schedules to secure the field of drivers for the upcoming video game, has seen pretty prominent drivers omitted from the roster of opponents in favor of generic fictional cars, much to the dismay of even the most casual of fans. Some of these cases are quite laughable considering the caliber of drivers they involve; despite winning the fall Richmond race in 2004 and securing a spot in NASCAR’s inaugural playoff race, Jeremy Mayfield did not appear in NASCAR 2005: Chase for the Cup, whereas Roush Racing phenom Carl Edwards, who had won three times in 2007, was nowhere to be seen when the series made the jump to the Xbox 360 later that summer with NASCAR 08. For NASCAR fans, it was akin to booting up Formula One 2016, and discovering Red Bull had been replaced by a fictional racing team, dubbed “Codemasters F1,” with Ricciardo and Verstappen replaced by the names and mugshots of two interns who “looked the part.”

And of course, with developers knowing full well that the two major support series would not be as popular as the Sunday Cup series, several teams had no problem filling a vast portion of the grids with bogus fantasy drivers – killing any sense of immersion in the process. If this sounds outlandish to those not familiar with NASCAR games, that’s because it was, and on the PC, this is exactly what led to such an extensive modding and add-on livery community; Papyrus left out Chip Ganassi Racing in it’s entirety for their final release, NASCAR Racing 2003 Season, instead bundling the game with a selection of 20-odd fantasy drivers that all seemed to promote other products affiliated with Vivendi Universal at the time – such as a World of Warcraft car.

Dolphin 2017-07-20 18-02-15-60.png

On the contrary, 704 Games have published the full list of all 32 NASCAR Camping World Truck Series drivers who will appear in NASCAR Heat 2 this fall, with their Facebook page showing off high-resolution renders for those who want a closer look, though Facebook has obviously murdered their quality. After multiple generations of NASCAR games in which developers shamelessly inserted themselves, friends, and co-workers into major NASCAR release to compensate for a lack of real-world drivers, it’s obviously a fantastic change of pace. Most NASCAR fans thought this would simply never happen, as the complexity of acquiring individual rights to the exact liveries and sponsor packages of over 110 professional drivers seems pretty astronomical for any major dev team to achieve, let alone a team as small and unproven as 704.

Is this one of the benefits of their new location, working directly underneath NASCAR’s corporate offices in Charlotte, North Carolina? Quite possibly, though as I’ve mentioned in the title of this post, this doesn’t exactly mean the rest of the game will receive this level of dedication. Recent gameplay trailers for NASCAR Heat 2 have been fairly lackluster, failing to show any prolific revisions to the game’s handling model and making a very poor display of the truck series at Eldora, so while it’s certainly a cause for celebration that we’ll have a full field of drivers in a NASCAR console game without the need for third party mods, there’s still a lot 704 need to do in an effort to ensure NASCAR Heat 2 is worth your time and money.

First NASCAR Heat 2 Details Surface

Though oval racing certainly isn’t everyone’s cup of tea around these parts, and the previous NASCAR Heat game was nothing short of a dumpster fire that spat in the face of every fan who had already suffered through countless years of mediocrity, details have began to float to the surface regarding NASCAR Heat 2 over the past couple of days. With the leading company changing names yet again – now operating under the moniker of 704 Games rather than Dusenberry-Martin Interactive – and promises of proper development cycle culminating in a September launch window instead of the rushed process that undoubtedly caused last year’s game to nosedive in quality, NASCAR Heat 2 will once again release on a trio of modern gaming platforms near the end of the actual NASCAR season. A lot of you may rightly assume it’s a bit counter-intuitive for 704 Games to ship a product so late in the year, but this is the exact launch schedule EA Sports would use during their time in possession of the exclusive NASCAR license, so at least there’s a partial effort to retain that same tradition.

Aside from the sketchy name change, which raised red flags when we reported on it a few months back here at PRC, details have remained pretty sparse in regards to what the actual gameplay experience will contain when NASCAR Heat 2 drops this September. With Heat Evolution generating such a negative reaction from fans, not a lot of people are actively seeking out teaser shots or inside information, resulting in a situation where all we know is that the cover athlete will be either Martin Truex Jr. or 2015 Sprint Cup Series champion Kyle Busch – decided upon during segment two of the all-star race at Charlotte this weekend, with the cover position going to the higher finishing driver of the two.

However, to my surprise there exists a core group of dedicated NASCAR Heat fans who have actually busted their asses to find out as much as possible about the new game despite the company’s previous releases not warranting any sort of fanbase, and though the major sim racing sites haven’t picked up on it, information is starting to leak. So to the NASCAR Heat YouTube and Twitter community, thank you so much for your dedication.

NASCAR Camping World Truck Series driver Brandon Brown heavily implied in a short Twitter video clip that all three major NASCAR national series – trucks, muscle cars, and sedans for those who can’t be assed with looking up sponsor names – will be included in NASCAR Heat 2. This is a major revelation, as once Electronic Arts and Monster Games began implementing several different NASCAR-sanctioned series into their games during the PlayStation 2 era, any developer who failed to include these support series were automatically at a disadvantage and blasted by NASCAR fans for having less content than games released a decade earlier. It’s exciting to know the lower-tier trucks and muscle cars will make a return to officially licensed NASCAR games, as it immediately indicates career mode will be exponentially more expansive than Heat Evolution and the Eutechnyx games were, presumably allowing you to climb the NASCAR ladder as an aspiring professional race car driver would.

This also indicates that all three series will have near-complete fields of real-world drivers if journeymen like Brandon Brown are talking about being in the upcoming NASCAR game, which is a major step in the right direction. Previous NASCAR titles by Eutechnyx and 704 Games – and Electronic Arts as well, though it wasn’t as big of a problem – routinely failed to acquire rights to all active drivers on the grid due to sponsorship or contract issues, leading to situations where feeder series drivers were placed in semi-fictional cars that never actually competed to ensure the 43-car fields would be populated entirely by real drivers. It was like if Codemasters could not get the rights to the Toro Rosso F1 team, so they shoehorned some random GP2 organization in it’s place – which pissed off fans who were hoping for the authenticity advertised on the box to actually be present in the software.

We’ve also learned a bit more about 704 Games, as what we originally speculated to be a questionable name change to get away from the nasty reputation the team once acquired appears to have warranted something much more beneficial – and we kind of wish we knew about this sooner, because it totally changes the atmosphere surrounding NASCAR Heat 2.

Fox 46 Charlotte have reported that the group are now located in the actual NASCAR office building residing in Charlotte, North Carolina, allowing team members in charge of licensing deals and miscellaneous authenticity quips to merely take a brief elevator ride directly to NASCAR representatives, in order to receive the green light for features, licensing approvals, and any creative freedom questions that may arise. Considering how much of the genuine NASCAR experience relies on correctly placed advertisement decals, unique car liveries, up-to-date track renovations, rule changes, and the other fine details of a racing series that many people correctly imply is this weird hybrid of professional wrestling and auto racing, it’s comforting to know that the resources to make a great game are literally two floors above them.

But it also means there’s no excuse if they fuck it all up.

It’s certainly not hard proof that NASCAR Heat 2 will be an overwhelmingly positive improvement compared to its predecessor, but so far it appears 704 Games have the tools in place to get the job done, and signs point to the return of additional series that fans have long requested to be implemented after years of being omitted despite their inclusion on inferior hardware. The key thing I’m looking at here is that on the outset, NASCAR Heat 2 will be enough of a change from the previous game to warrant a purchase and subsequent shakedown on launch day.

But if 704 Games once again release a product that is buggy, unfinished, and suffers from performance issues, their fall from grace will be even more tarnishing to the team, and most likely prompt yet another exclusivity swap. With the Eutechnyx series, at the end of the day you could blame the obvious lack of quality on a group of European game developers who obviously didn’t care about NASCAR and were pushing out a minimum viable product to generate a profit from loyal NASCAR fans. However, now that 704 Games are literally in the same building as NASCAR themselves, and have been graced with a full development cycle, there’s no excuse to ship a sub-par product. The classic Heat games of yesteryear were fantastic, with Dirt to Daytona still actively enjoyed by hardcore sim racers going through hell and back just to get Dolphin or PCSX2 running smoothly. If you can’t recapture this experience with modern technology and the full support of NASCAR, it’s a sign that more than a name change is needed.

New Company Name, Same Horrid NASCAR Game

So the NASCAR license did change hands. Sort of.

The downfall of NASCAR games started with an European shovelware publisher known as Eutechnyx acquiring the right’s to America’s most prominent auto racing series, a bizarre decision considering the team’s lack of any reasonable proximity to the reference material, as well as NASCAR’s non-existent popularity across the Atlantic ocean. After a predictable string of horrible releases that quite frankly embarrassed both casual and hardcore NASCAR fans alike, key staff members jumped ship from the eternal dumpster fire responsible for Ride to Hell: Retribution and Auto Club Revolution, promptly rebranded themselves as Dusenberry-Martin Interactive, promised a substantial increase in the overall quality of future products, yet slapped NASCAR fans in the face by re-releasing NASCAR ’14 with an updated driver roster, calling it NASCAR ’15, and still crediting development of the game to Eutechnyx, at least according to Wikipedia.

With critical reception consistently falling below 50% with each yearly release, Dusenberry-Martin Interactive then hastily went out and recruited Monster Games, developers of the critically acclaimed NASCAR: Dirt to Daytona over a decade ago on significantly different hardware – supposedly giving them just six months to slap a game together. The result was a complete disaster; NASCAR Heat Evolution used engine sounds and car performance attributes from 2000, did not feature caution flags in online play, and in the end was a product so horribly unfinished, you’re unable to crash out and retire from a race. I have been sent over the catchfence at Daytona, only to head into the pits and regain the lead eighteen laps later. I’ve tried several times to enjoy Heat Evolution for what it is – a lighthearted NASCAR games with authentic liveries and tracks – and it’s just not possible. I always find myself heading back to the EA Sports offerings of the early 2000’s.

Unfortunately, what I’m about to write is not a poor April Fool’s joke. Once again, key staff members have jumped ship from the eternal dumpster fire responsible for NASCAR The Game: 2013 and NASCAR Heat Evolution, and rebranded themselves as 704 Games. Under the new moniker, a sequel to NASCAR Heat Evolution will be released this fall – the sequel to a game where the car is sent barrel-rolling if you do so much as brush the wall.

Seething rage does not begin to describe how I feel about this announcement; what appears to be largely the same group of individuals responsible for the officially licensed NASCAR abominations dating back to 2011 have basically taken to re-naming their company every couple of years to continue churning out garbage NASCAR products under the guise of “next year’s game will be different, we promise, see, we have a new company name and a totally different mentality”, a line of games no fans have ever been satisfied with and openly blast on the game’s official subreddit by comparing it to games released a decade ago – which has sinced moved to a new subreddit to reflect the change in the company’s name.

There is no long-winded rant to follow this news. This is silly, and it needs to stop. The NASCAR license needed to change hands, and this wasn’t the way to do it. Obviously I can’t sit here and label these guys as scam artists or anything, but as a consumer, what I’m seeing is the same company changing their name every few years to retain the license through what I assume must be some sort of loophole, only to push out horrid video games that upset fans and tarnish the image of the brand. NASCAR console games used to be absolutely awesome time-killers with compelling on-track action and an insane amount of shit to do after the festivities in victory lane – unfortunately, this is now no longer the case. Don’t give these guys your money for the sequel to Heat Evolution, and maybe NASCAR will figure it out for themselves that shit needs to change.

It used to be so much better; there’s really no reason for NASCAR games to go backwards despite extreme advances in technology.

Is the NASCAR License Set to Change Hands?

16722707_681491298691178_504163733342424240_oNot everyone who reads PRC.net is a hardcore NASCAR fan, so I’ll try to make this introduction as brief as I possibly can. After years of the license to America’s most popular racing series bouncing from Electronic Arts to the lowly makers of Ride to Hell: Retribution in Eutechnyx, NASCAR finally found a home with Monster Games – the same developer who had created a killer officially licensed title for the Nintendo GameCube and Sony PlayStation 2 during a time when exclusivity deals simply didn’t happen. Unfortunately, the prodigal return of the license to a veteran stock car racing developer after almost a decade spent in a metaphorical hell was anything but a celebration, as the many years Monster Games had spent working on titles such as ExciteTruck and Donkey Kong: Tropical Freeze, along with the allegedly unusable assets inherited from the Eutechnyx franchise, meant the product Monster Games shipped in September of 2016 was pretty horrifying – nothing like the return to form most were expecting.

While many fans – including myself – lashed out at the clearly rushed package and penned lengthy odysseys detailing every last flaw and shortcoming with NASCAR Heat: Evolution, a vocal minority begged for the immense criticism to subside, pulling the age-old excuse “it’s their first try in X amount of years at a major NASCAR release, show them support with your wallet and maybe the next game will be a lot better.”

Unfortunately, there might not be another game from these guys to begin with.

nascar-heat-evolution-10_13_2016-10_09_25-am-768x480Away from the hyper-critical confines of PRC.net, NASCAR Heat: Evolution has been universally panned by major gaming websites, as well as practically any NASCAR fan with a modern internet connection. Aside from Polygon’s glowing score of 75 – highly questionable due to their previous demonstrated incompetence when playing skill based video games – other established outlets noted Heat was a decidedly average experience with no shinning moments, whereas NASCAR fans themselves were significantly harsher when it came to dishing out user scores. Obviously, a combined average score of 4.1 speaks volumes about NASCAR Heat’s quality.

Developers make bad games; this is something that happens all the time and is almost unavoidable now thanks to how technology has progressed, as well as the current state of the industry valuing profits and schedules above the artistic aspect of game development. However, the entire reason for Heat’s existence in the first place was to move on from the previous string of bad officially licensed NASCAR titles dating back all the way back to early 2011, and obviously it didn’t play out the way they wanted it to. It’s hard to believe a sanctioning body so sensitive to how they’re portrayed on store shelves like NASCAR is wouldn’t put their foot down in this situation. Pure speculation, sure, but as I said, Heat was created to try and break this chain of bad games. It didn’t happen. You bet your ass DMi and Monster Games were on an infinitely short leash from the beginning, and it’s not hard to see where this might be heading.

nascar ratings.jpgWhen plans to resurrect the Heat tagline were first announced by DMi Games, the product that eventually became NASCAR Heat: Evolution was never  explicitly implied to be the first entry in a multi-year franchise as we typically see with mass-market sports games, but instead a one-off project. Though the initial press release stated Dusenberry-Martin had obtained the rights to create NASCAR games until 2020, Heat Evolution was treated as just that – Heat Evolution. So I’m under the impression there was a clause in the contract allowing NASCAR to bail early if the product wasn’t up to snuff.

Circumstantial evidence of this can be seen in the $10 USD 2017 Monster Energy Cup Series DLC that recently came out, which adds the 2017 NASCAR season to Heat Evolution in a very limited fashion,  suspiciously not allowing you to race the new season of cars online against your friends – which is something basically anyone who bought the package would obviously want to do. Even with the nicest of developers fueling the project, most yearly sports games don’t do major season updates like these – you’re forced to wait until next years’ game for the updated list of drivers and circuits – so the act of pushing out a severely limited season update package like this raises a red flag or two.

sloppyThe execution of the package is also quite sloppy for what it offers, with contingencies and windshield banners varying across all 40 vehicles – as if the DLC was just sort of slapped together at the last minute, with nobody at Monster Games giving enough of a shit to check for consistency across all liveries. The Joe Gibbs Racing stable of vehicles feature the Monster Energy Cup Series logo across the windshield, while the Hendrick Motorsports cars still rock the abbreviated driver names from last season, and entries such as Matt DiBenedetto’s #32 Fusion don’t feature any driver name over the window or series decal under the A-pillar at all. These kinds of sloppy mistakes are something you’d expect from an amateur painter over at NNRacing.com posting work-in-progress shots of his own free carset on the forums, not a developer with the official NASCAR license selling you a 2017 season update on Steam.

With a hastily released 2017 Season package that can’t even get the official series decals appearing on all of the cars, and won’t allow you to race against your friends with the new update, I’m under the impression something is happening behind the scenes we’re not aware of. This kind of shoddy workmanship and strange restrictions usually indicates a studio is in the process of backing away entirely from their project.

untitled-2When NASCAR fans have inquired about a sequel to NASCAR Heat Evolution, obviously hoping their purchase last September was not made in vain, DMR Games have responded by saying there is “no news yet on a future iteration of NASCAR Heat: Evolution.” Copy/pasted responses are commonplace on the game’s official Facebook page, with elaborate suggestions written by passionate NASCAR fans given an almost automated response by the lone PR staff member in charge of the account, saying they will take the ideas into consideration – highly unlikely to happen if the next game were to come out later this year. The complete lack of excitement from these responses makes it hard to believe something brand new, or even a basic announcement about when we’ll learn about the next game in the franchise, is around the corner.

And that wouldn’t be surprising.

nascarNASCAR as a racing series is dying a slow, painful death. With dwindling TV ratings, non-traditional race formats driving away fans, and support series races on Friday and Saturday that are completely unwatchable due to the abundance of wrecks, the brand’s reputation is at an all-time low. Most auto racing fans have chalked up NASCAR events to be a form of motorized wrestling – an assumption occasionally vocalized by the drivers themselves. As a result, they are now in survival mode. They cannot be complacent with how their brand is represented in the public eye if they want to stop bleeding viewers every weekend, and I would not be surprised if their notoriously shitty licensed video games – in this instance, NASCAR Heat – will be on the chopping block in some fashion.